Desa Tulusbesar
Village profile and administrative service site, from research to handover.
5 pages · 4 hamlets · manual book
- Role
- Project Lead
- Team
- 8 people
- Duration
- 2 months
- Status
- Live & handed over
Context & problem
Desa Tulusbesar has 6,543 residents across four hamlets. Information was scattered across notice boards and chat groups, and residents visited the office just to ask about requirements. Tourism and small businesses had no digital storefront.
Role & responsibilities
I led a team of eight and owned scope, work allocation, and the relationship with village staff. I also built the frontend, the UI/UX design, and part of the backend.
Planning
We started from staff interviews, then sorted findings into three layers: must exist before handover, important but can follow, and future ideas. The timeline ran backwards from handover with one week of reserve.
Coordination
The team was split by track — village content, public interface, admin panel, WebGIS map — with one owner each. I was the single contact for village staff so they never received conflicting requests.
Progress monitoring
Monitoring happened through live walkthroughs with village staff. Unclear buttons, foreign terminology, and overlong flows became a prioritised fix list immediately.
Handover
Done meant village staff could manage content themselves. We prepared a manual book, a short training session, and a handover document; the site is live at tulusbesar.com.
Risks & responses
Outcomes
- Website live at tulusbesar.com and used as the village’s official information channel.
- Administrative requirements can be viewed and downloaded without visiting the office.
- Tourism, culture, and small-business potential have a digital storefront, including a WebGIS map.
- Formally handed over with a manual book so the village can manage content independently.
What I would do differently
A post-release audit found two defects that slipped through: the document download button showed “File not yet on server”, and document categories still contained test data. The lesson is clear — I tested the flow as a developer, not as a resident opening the site on a phone with a slow connection. Going forward I will build the release checklist from the end user’s point of view and have someone other than the feature’s author run it.
Artifacts
- Project charter & scope ↗ kkn-charter.pdf
- Timeline & track allocation ↗ kkn-timeline.pdf
- Stakeholder map ↗ kkn-stakeholder.pdf
- Handover checklist ↗ kkn-handover.pdf
Documentation reconstructed from project archives for portfolio purposes.